🔗 Share this article Moscow Demands Substantial Amount in Compensation from Clearing House Regarding Seized Funds The Russian central bank has stated it is claiming damages totaling $230 billion against the financial institution Euroclear. This move constitutes a direct warning by the Kremlin against proposals to utilize frozen Russian state assets to support Ukraine. The Financial Lawsuit Based on reports in local state media, the central bank filed a lawsuit last week for roughly 18 trillion roubles. This amount is equivalent to the stated $230 billion claim. European Union officials are set to decide in the coming days on a proposal to leverage around €210 billion in immobilized Russian state funds. This scheme involves providing Ukraine with a large loan to fund its military and economic needs. The vast majority of these assets, totaling €185 billion, reside at the Euroclear clearing house in Brussels. Euroclear acts as the main keeper for the Kremlin's immobilised financial reserves. Dispute on Ownership EU authorities have argued that their plan is on solid legal ground. Their position rests on the fact that ownership of the state assets still belongs to Russia, despite being it was immobilized in European jurisdictions shortly after the full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Moscow, however, has labeled any use of the funds as theft. Authorities have warned of retaliatory measures, including confiscating EU private investors' assets within Russia. Kirill Dmitriev, who has taken on a prominent position in diplomatic talks, stated on X that Russia "will win in court" and regain its assets. He added that the European Union, the euro, and Euroclear "will face consequences" from the plan. Strategic Positioning In comments interpreted as an effort to drive a wedge between Europe and the United States, Dmitriev described the proposal as "a severe assault on property rights and the global financial system established by the United States." The clearing house declined to comment on the latest legal action. It has in the past stated it is contending with over 100 legal cases in Russian jurisdictions. Enforcement Challenges Although courts in European nations are unlikely to enforce rulings from Russian courts, analysts expect Moscow to pursue enforcement in countries with closer relations to the Kremlin. "Russian monetary authorities may attempt to implement a Russian legal ruling against Euroclear in countries such as China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other friendly states, provided that relevant assets can be located," stated a legal expert from an international firm. EU Countermeasures European authorities said they are developing steps to discourage other nations from assisting any Russian legal action against European entities. Additionally, they are designing protections to shield EU countries with assets in Russia from what they term "unlawful expropriation." The Proposed Loan Mechanism According to the complex plan, the EU would issue an first €90 billion loan to Ukraine, backed by the proceeds earned from the immobilized assets at Euroclear. Importantly, Russia's ownership claim on the underlying funds would stay untouched. Ukraine would solely be obligated to repay the loan in the event that Russia consented to pay reparations for the vast destruction caused during the nearly four-year war. Other Funding Ideas Belgium, supported by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has urged the EU to examine an alternative approach for funding Ukraine. This entails joint EU borrowing to secure a loan, using unallocated funds within the European budget. Such a proposal, nevertheless, requires unanimity among all 27 member states. Hungary's government, viewed as aligned with the Kremlin, has previously expressed its opposition. Commenting on Monday, the EU top diplomat, a senior official, described the proposed loan scheme as "the strongest solution" for aiding Ukraine. "This mechanism is based on the Russian immobilized funds, which means it doesn't come from our taxpayers' money, which is equally important," she stated. "It also sends a powerful signal that when you cause all this destruction to another country, you must pay for the reparations."